Commentary for Bava Metzia 110:1

לרבות פחות משוה פרוטה להישבון לקדש אין אבל להדיוט לא

this [<i>'and</i>'] extends the law of restoration even to less than a perutah's worth. Thus, it applies to <i>hekdesh</i>, but not to <i>hullin</i>!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., no legal compulsion can be exerted to effect the restoration of something worth less than a perutah in the case of hullin; this follows from the fact that the Baraitha deduces the necessity of such restoration only in the case of sacred objects. ');">¹</span> — But if stated, it was stated thus: R. Kattina said, if the court met for [a claim of] the equivalent of a <i>perutah</i>, they conclude [the hearing] even for less,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If the claim of the plaintiff was reduced in the course of the trial. ');">²</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Metzia 110:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.